 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major Cities in Alaska with Drug Rehab and Treatment Centers:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
866-407-4380
|
Drug Rehab Alaska
is here to help people with drug and/or alcohol abuse problems in Alaska. find treatment options. Due to our diverse networking system we can find a treatment option tailored to each individuals specific situation and needs. We are able to provide all phases of recovery included but not limited to, alcohol and/or drug intervention, drug and/or alcohol detox, in-patient treatment, out-patient treatment, short term treatment (30 days or less), long term treatment (90 days or longer).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We design personalized treatment programs to provide each abuser with the greatest chance of a successful recovery outcome. Our comprehensive networking system works hand in hand with all of the drug treatment centers in Alaska. At Drug Rehab Alaska we know that each individual is unique and are treated as such. Deciding upon a treatment option in Alaska, or anywhere can be a daunting task for any individual or family, we will guide you through each step of a comprehensive treatment plan for you or your loved one. We are determined in our mission, that every drug and/or alcohol abuser in Alaska. that has a desire to change their life will be given a chance to recover from their addiction and we are dedicated to ensuring that they are given the opportunity to do so.
|
|
We realize that each individual in Alaska. is in a different financial situation and we will find treatment options for each individual regardless of their financial situation. No matter what your financial situation everyone will receive the treatment help they are looking for.
|
|
|
|
866-407-4380
|
|
2 Drug Convictions Reversed on Appeal in Alaskarights: Court says illegal Alaska police acts made evidence inadmissible. In two cases that demonstrate the complicated boundary between an Alaska citizen's right to be let alone and law enforcement's need to search for evidence of crime, the Alaska Court of Appeals has thrown out two minor drug convictions based on illegal police conduct.
In a 2001 Fairbanks, Alaska case Samuel Carter was convicted of fourth-degree misconduct involving a controlled substance after Fairbanks police officers saw crack pipes and syringes in his hotel room drawer. Carter opened the drawer when police ordered him to pack his belongings and vacate the room.
The court in a decision Friday said police had no right to evict Carter from the room even though it was past the Fairbanks, Alaska Comfort Inn's normal checkout time. Therefore, any evidence they found as a result of the illegal eviction was inadmissible.
The Alaska police suspected Carter of criminal activity and had been watching him. They got permission from hotel management to search the room once Carter and other people who shared it with him had relinquished occupancy, thus losing their expectation of privacy.
However, hotel management had no problem with the occupants staying past the 1 p.m. checkout time and did not ask police to evict them, the court said.
Superior Court Judge Mary Greene allowed the prosecution to use the seized evidence against Carter. The appeals court reversed Greene's decision and reversed Carter's conviction.
In a 2000 Anchorage, Alaska case Brian Young was handcuffed by a police officer who saw him hide something under a closet door at the Mush Inn. The item proved to be several rocks of crack cocaine wrapped in tissue paper. Young was subsequently convicted of fourth-degree drug possession.
The Alaska officer had responded to a disturbance call that did not involve Young. Young came around a corner of the building, looked surprised to see police, then quickly backed away. An officer, his suspicions aroused, followed.
The court said a person's obvious desire to avoid police is not by itself legal justification for "investigative detention." And although the motel's "reputation as the scene of illegal drug activity," plus Young's effort to hide something from police, was a reasonable basis for Alaska police suspicion, that's not the same thing as probable cause for a search.
Without probable cause, the officer had no right to seize and open the package, the court said.
When asked by the Alaska officer what he had hidden under the door, Young said he hadn't hidden anything. In court, the state argued that denial of ownership meant Young had abandoned the item, so no search warrant or probable cause was needed. The court said Young had hidden the item, not discarded it.
Superior Court Judge Mike Wolverton allowed prosecutors to use the seized drugs against Young. The Alaska appeals court reversed Wolverton's decision and overturned Young's conviction.
Drug Rehab by County
|
|
More...